# Verification record — `ae/icp/visa-single-entry-long-stay-pleasure` v1.0.0 This file is the **source-review record** for this document version, per the `manual-source-review-v1` practice. It documents the provenance of the published fields and flow and states the current verification claim honestly. ## Current claim - **`status`:** `draft` - **`verification.method`:** `manual-source-review-v1` - **`verification.lastVerifiedAt`:** `2026-07-06` The document was derived from a **directly-read primary source**: ICP's own official Smart Services user guide, retrieved as a PDF and read page-by-page via PDF-to-image rendering (its embedded text layer is sparse — mostly step captions and instructional prose, not the on-screen field labels themselves). It remains `draft`, not `verified`, pending an independent second reviewer's field-by-field pass. ## Why this document exists This is a standing `GovSchema Standard Research` cycle ([GOV-1421](../../../../GOV-1421)). The United Arab Emirates currently only has Taxes-vertical schemas (`ae/fta/vat-registration`, `ae/fta/corporate-tax-registration`); this document opens **AE's 2nd vertical (Visa)** via a single-entry, long-stay "pleasure" (visit) entry visa sponsored by a UAE resident for a dependent/visitor, filed through the ICP (Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs & Port Security) Smart Services platform. ## Source examined - **Document `(id, version)`:** `ae/icp/visa-single-entry-long-stay-pleasure` / `1.0.0` - **Spec version:** GovSchema `0.3.0` - **Authority:** Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs & Port Security (ICP), United Arab Emirates - **Primary source URL:** - **Official document title:** "Federal Authority for Identity & Citizenship, Customs & Port Security (Smart Services) User Guide – Individuals Services", Version 0.1, dated January 2022 - **Retrieved / reviewed:** 2026-07-06 - **Reviewer:** GovSchema Engineering (initial authoring source-review) ## Access constraint and how it was worked around The guide is a plain, directly downloadable PDF from icp.gov.ae's own WordPress media library — no login, no CAPTCHA. It is **49 pages, almost entirely UI screenshots**: pdfjs-dist's extractable text layer yields only step captions and instructional prose (e.g. "Enter the address information in the required fields"), not the actual on-screen field labels visible in each screenshot (e.g. "Shareholding Percentage"-style specifics, here things like "Qualification", "Faith", "Local Flat Number"). Every field in this schema was therefore read directly off the **rendered screenshots**, not the text layer: each PDF page was rasterized to a PNG (`pdfjs-dist@3.11.174` legacy build + `node-canvas`, using a custom `NodeCanvasFactory` — the current `pdfjs-dist@6.x` default export throws `TypeError: Image or Canvas expected` when painting inline/JPEG images under `node-canvas` in this environment, so the older 3.x line was used instead) and read with Claude's own vision capability, the same technique this registry has used for `ae/fta/vat-registration` and `ae/fta/corporate-tax-registration`. The live Smart Services wizard itself requires an authenticated Individuals Services account (UAE ID / email+password login, per pp.6-14 of the guide); this is expected and out of scope — the guide's own screenshots (taken from an already-logged-in "Test User" sponsor session) and the downloadable PDF require no login to read. ## What was confirmed directly (verbatim, from the rendered screenshots) The guide's "Submit a Request" section (pp.20-32) walks a single worked example end-to-end: selecting Department → Module ("Visa") → Service ("Single Entry") → Sub Service ("Long Stay Pleasure") → Service Action ("Issue New Visa") on p.20-21, then completing the resulting 5-stage wizard (`Applicant Info → Address Info → Attachments Info → Review Application → Application Fees`, shown as a numbered 1-5 stepper inside a 3-labelled-step shell on every wizard screenshot): - **p.22-23, First Step – Applicant Info:** the "Personal Information For Sponsored (Service Beneficiary)" accordion panel (Relationship, Name English/Arabic, Current/Previous Nationality, Gender, Date Of Birth, Birth Country, Marital Status, Place Of Birth English/Arabic, Mother Name English/Arabic, Qualification, Professions, Religion, Faith, Visit Reason) and the "Passport Information" panel (Passport Type, No, Issue Place English/Arabic, Issue Date, Expire Date, Issue Country). A read-only "Host Information" block above them (the sponsor's own English/Arabic name, nationality, Host Number, UAE Unified No., passport no./expiry, Category "Residence Sponsor", Emirates ID, DOB) is **not modelled** — it is the logged-in sponsor's own pre-populated account data, not applicant input this schema collects. - **p.24, First Step – Address Info:** the full "Inside UAE Address" block (Emirate, City, Area, Detailed Address, Building/Hotel, Local Flat Number, P.O. Box, UAE Mobile Number with country-code prefix, Residence Tel with country-code prefix, Email) and "Address outside UAE" block (Abroad Country, Detailed Address Outside UAE, Permanent Mobile Number with country-code prefix). An "Add New Address" button is visible next to "Inside UAE Address", implying a repeating address list (see "Out of scope" below). - **p.25-26, Second Step – Attachments Info:** all **14** named document checklist items, each with an explicit (Required)/(Optional) tag, read verbatim: (1) Copy of the Sponsor's Passport valid for minimum of six months (Required), (2) Colored Photo (Required), (3) Copy of Sponsor's Passport (Required), (4) Place of Residence (Rent Contract or Hotel Reservation) - Mandatory for residents only (Optional), (5) Proof of Kinship (Optional), (6) Health Insurance covers the period of stay (Optional), (7) Birth Certificates of children which shall be duly attested (Optional), (8) Salary Certificate (Optional), (9) Copy of Trade License (Investor) (Optional), (10) A copy of the Sponsor's Residence (Optional), (11) Electricity Bill (Optional), (12) Copy of the Traveling Return Ticket (Optional), (13) Certified Account Statement (Optional), (14) A copy of Deposit Paper (in case of old system payment) (Optional). Also confirmed: a blue info callout listing the 7 government authorities whose systems some attachments are auto-fetched from (Abu Dhabi Municipality, Health Authority of Abu Dhabi, Emirates Identity Authority, Department of Economic Development Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Police, Abu Dhabi Water and Electricity Authority, Ministry of Health), the Daman-insurance carve-out note, and the upload constraints ("Attachment max size 2 mega byte"; "Allowed Types: .jpeg, .jpg, .pdf") — both encoded in each document's `constraints`. - **p.27-28, Second Step – Review Application:** a pure read-only recap of every prior step's entered values (Host Information, Personal Information, Passport Information, Addresses Info, Attachments Info) — **not modelled** as fields, consistent with this registry's convention of not modelling read-only summary views. - **p.29-31, Third Step – Application Fees:** the fee schedule table (Urgent Service Fees, Request Fees, Issue Fees, Security Deposits, E-Services Fees, ICA Fees — all source-computed amounts, not applicant input, so not modelled as fields), the "Healthy Insurance" selector (a red-asterisked, required choice between two named providers shown simultaneously, "Dhafra Insurance Fees" and "ADNIC Insurance Fees"), the "I Agree to the Terms and Conditions" checkbox, and the "Pay using" step offering two distinct, simultaneously-visible payment options ("Amwal" branded credit card, or "Pay Later"). p.31's "Payment Details" screen (Card Type Visa/Mastercard, Card Number, Expiration Month/Year, CVN) is a third-party Amwal-hosted payment-gateway page — **not modelled**, the same way no other schema in this registry models a raw card-entry field. - **p.32:** a receipt sample (read-only) — not modelled. ## Judgment calls / scope cuts (read before reviewing) 1. **Undocumented dropdown option lists.** Almost every dropdown field in this guide (Relationship, Current/Previous Nationality, Gender, Birth Country, Marital Status, Qualification, Profession, Religion, Faith, Passport Type, Passport Issue Country, City, Area, Abroad Country) shows only its **selected value** in the worked example's screenshot — the guide never expands any of these dropdowns to show the full option list (unlike, say, `ae/fta/vat-registration`'s Entity Type field, whose full 12-item list was printed verbatim in a source "Note" callout). Per the discipline already established by `au/aec/voter-enrolment`'s `gender` field, this schema does **not** invent an enum for any of these — they are all modelled as `type: "string"` with a description stating only the confirmed selected value from the screenshot. A reviewer with access to the live (authenticated) wizard should check whether any of these are worth promoting to `enum` once the real option lists can be confirmed. 2. **`insideUaeEmirate` enum reused by analogy, not independently re-confirmed.** This is the one dropdown modelled as `enum` rather than `string`. The guide's own screenshot only shows "Abu Dhabi" selected, not an expanded list. The 7-value enum (`abu_dhabi`, `dubai`, `sharjah`, `ajman`, `umm_al_quwain`, `ras_al_khaimah`, `fujairah`) is carried over from the sibling `ae/fta/vat-registration` document's own confirmed "Emirates" dropdown (its full 7-item list was independently verified there). This is a deliberate judgment call — the 7 Emirates are a small, fixed, universally known real-world list independent of any one government form, so the risk of divergence is low, but a reviewer should flag this if the live ICP wizard's Emirate list differs (e.g. omits or orders differently) from the FTA one. 3. **Duplicate-looking passport-copy attachment items.** Attachment items (1) "Copy of the Sponsor's Passport valid for minimum of six months" (Required) and (3) "Copy of Sponsor's Passport" (Required) both name the Sponsor's passport and are both marked Required — this looks redundant, but it is read verbatim, twice, from the source screenshot (confirmed at 4.5x and cropped for legibility). It has not been "corrected" or merged into one document; a reviewer should re-check this isn't a rendering artifact by re-fetching and re-rendering p.25 independently. 4. **`belongsTo` assignment on attachments is inferred, not stated.** The spec's `belongsTo` enum (`applicant`, `dependent`, `responsible-party`, `other`) has no dedicated "sponsor" value. This schema treats the sponsored beneficiary (the person the visa is actually issued to) as `applicant`, and the UAE-resident sponsor/Host (the account holder who files the request) as `responsible-party`. Documents explicitly named "Sponsor's ..." (passport ×2, Residence, Salary Certificate, Trade License, Electricity Bill, Certified Account Statement) are tagged `responsible-party`; identity/insurance/ticket documents about the sponsored person are tagged `applicant`; Proof of Kinship and the old-system Deposit Paper are tagged `other` since neither party exclusively "owns" them. None of this ownership split is stated explicitly in the source guide — it is inferred from each label's plain-English meaning and this vertical's usual UAE-sponsorship pattern, and a reviewer should sanity-check each assignment. 5. **No array/repeating-field type (GSP-0009).** GovSchema v0.3 has no array/repeating-group type. Two repeating structures are visible in the source but modelled only as their first/bounded instance: (a) the sponsor may sponsor **multiple dependents** in principle (the whole "Sponsored" feature, pp.35-41, manages many sponsored individuals per account), but this document — like `ae/fta/vat-registration`'s analogous repeating groups — models exactly one sponsored beneficiary/applicant per schema instance (i.e., one application = one beneficiary), matching the worked example itself; (b) the "Inside UAE Address" panel's own "Add New Address" button (p.24) implies more than one inside-UAE address can be attached to a single application — only the first/primary address is modelled here. 6. **Collapsed, never-expanded panels are out of scope.** Two accordion panels visible above "Personal Information For Sponsored" on p.22 — "Notes" and "Identification Information For Sponsored (Service Beneficiary)" — are shown collapsed (a "+" toggle) throughout the guide and never expanded/screenshotted. Their contents (plausibly, by analogy with the Host Information block, something like "does the beneficiary already have a UAE Emirates ID / Unified Number?") are **not modelled**, since nothing about their actual fields is directly confirmable from this source. A reviewer with live-wizard access should expand and document these if the schema is to advance toward `verified`. 7. **`requestUrgentService` semantics are ambiguous.** The Application Fees screenshot (p.29) shows "URGENT SERVICE FEES" with its checkbox unchecked and its whole row struck through (visually similar to a disabled/ unavailable state, not merely "left unchecked"). It isn't possible to tell from a single static screenshot whether urgent service was simply not selected in this example or is categorically unavailable for this particular service/scenario. Modelled here as an ordinary optional boolean; a reviewer with live-wizard access should confirm which reading is correct. 8. **Payment-gateway fields excluded.** The Amwal-hosted "Payment Details" screen (p.31: Card Type, Card Number, Expiration Month/Year, CVN) is a third-party PCI-scope payment page, not ICP's own application data model — excluded the same way no other schema in this registry models raw card-entry fields. Only the wizard's own `paymentMethod` choice (credit card vs. "Pay Later") is modelled. 9. **Fee-schedule line items are not modelled as fields.** Request Fees, Issue Fees, Security Deposits, E-Services Fees, and ICA Fees on p.29 are source-computed, read-only amounts (not applicant-editable), so — like every other schema in this registry — they are described in prose only, not as `fields`. ## Path to a `verified` claim (next step) To advance this document to `status: verified`, a reviewer needs to: 1. Independently re-fetch the guide PDF and re-render/re-read each cited page, confirming every field `sourceRef` against the actual screenshot. 2. Confirm ICP has not since published a newer guide revision superseding V0.1 (Jan 2022) — this platform's UI may have evolved materially since 2022, and only this one guide version was found this cycle. 3. If feasible, obtain access to the live (authenticated) Smart Services wizard to confirm or replace the `string`-typed dropdown fields with real `enum` option lists, expand the two collapsed accordion panels noted above, and resolve the `requestUrgentService` and duplicate-passport-copy ambiguities noted above. ## Re-verification Per the practice's **Cadence**, `nextReviewBy` is set to **2027-01-01** (~6 months). Re-check the source, and confirm no newer guide revision has been published, on or before that date and on any `source.url` change.