# Verification record — `ae/icp/emirates-id-replacement` v1.0.0 This file is the **source-review record** for this document version, per the `manual-source-review-v1` practice. It documents the provenance of the published fields and flow and states the current verification claim honestly. ## Current claim - **`status`:** `draft` - **`verification.method`:** `manual-source-review-v1` - **`verification.lastVerifiedAt`:** `2026-07-06` The document was derived from a **directly-read primary source**: ICP's own official Smart App user manual (Citizen Category, v5.23), retrieved as a PDF and read page-by-page via direct decompression of each page's embedded JPEG screenshot (zlib + DCTDecode) — the PDF's text layer uses custom-subsetted fonts and does not recover legibly. It remains `draft`, not `verified`, pending live-app execution testing (per this registry's `structural-reference` maturity convention — see the `ae/icp/visa-single-entry-long-stay-pleasure` sibling, whose own `status`/`maturity` remained `draft`/`structural-reference` after its review gate too). ## Independent review-gate re-verification (GOV-1477, 2026-07-06) An independent reviewer re-fetched both the citizen- and resident-category v5.23 manuals directly from `icp.gov.ae` (both downloaded cleanly, confirming no login/CAPTCHA/WAF gate — same access profile as the original authoring pass) and re-extracted every embedded screenshot using the same zlib+DCTDecode technique, additionally parsing the PDF's page-tree and content-stream `Do` (XObject paint) operators to programmatically map each embedded image to its exact page and on-page pixel position, rather than relying on manual visual sequencing. **Finding: every wizard-step page in the citizen manual embeds *two* stacked screenshots, not one — the initial authoring pass only read the first.** Cross-referencing each page's `/XObject` resource dictionary against its content stream's placement matrices (`cm`) showed that pages 15–19 and 22 each place two images with contiguous (touching, zero-gap) vertical bounding boxes — i.e. the manual's own screen-capture tooling split one continuous scrollable-screen capture into two separate embedded JPEGs per PDF page, not two visually distinct screens. The original authoring pass extracted and read only the first (top) image of each such pair, which is why the below-the-fold content flagged as "not confirmed" in the original judgment calls 2 and 6 below was in fact directly recoverable from the same source, just not inspected. Re-reading the second (bottom) image of each pair recovered **8 additional confirmed fields**, now added to the schema: - **Basic Information (p.15):** `familyBookIssuanceDate` (date, required, worked-example value "21/06/1995") and `replacementReason` (dropdown, required, worked-example value "Lost / Stolen"). - **Beneficiary Information (p.16):** `changeIdentityPersonalPhoto` (Yes/No toggle, required, defaulted "No" in the worked example). - **Passport Information (p.17):** `passportIssueCountry` (dropdown, required, worked-example value "UNITED ARAB EMIRATES"). - **Delivery Address Information (p.18):** `uaeMobileNumber` (required, pre-filled "00971"+"544099705" in the worked example) and `secondMobileNumber` (optional, blank/unfilled in the worked example — the only field of the eight without a visible required-asterisk). - **Residence Information (p.19):** `residencePhoneNumber` and `residenceEmail` (both required) — this step was previously modelled with an **empty `fields` list**, on the belief that the screen showed only a read-only address-summary card. The second image shows the same screen also contains a genuinely editable confirmation sub-form (pre-filled "UAE Phone number" and "Email") below that card. The step's `fields` array in `steps[]` is updated accordingly. **`termsAndConditionsAccepted` is now directly confirmed in the citizen manual's own capture**, on the fee-summary screen's second (below-the-fold) image — an "Agree To The Terms And Conditions" checkbox, exactly where judgment call 2 (below) predicted it would be if the screenshot weren't cut off. This retires the by-analogy inference from the resident-category manual: `sourceRef` now points to the citizen manual directly, and the `label` is corrected from "I Agree To The Terms And Conditions" (the resident manual's wording, previously carried over by analogy) to "Agree To The Terms And Conditions" (the citizen manual's own, verbatim wording — confirmed to lack the leading "I"). **Two further fields are confirmed to exist but are deliberately NOT modelled, pending label confirmation:** 1. A dropdown field between `secondNameEnglish` and `changeIdentityPersonalPhoto` on the Beneficiary Information screen, worked-example value "PRODUCER" (contextually a profession/occupation-type field). 2. A field between `passportIssueDate` and `passportIssueCountry` on the Passport Information screen, worked-example value an Arabic-script string (contextually plausible as a passport issue-place field, but not confirmed). In both cases the field's own label row falls in the **exact pixel seam** between the manual's two stacked screenshots (confirmed by cropping and re-rendering the boundary region at native resolution: the first image ends mid-field, immediately after the *previous* field's input box, and the second begins with only the dropdown/input control itself, no label above it) — there is no crop offset that recovers it from this source. Rather than invent a label, this document leaves both fields unmodelled. A future reviewer should either find a differently-paginated render of the same manual (e.g. a version where the scroll-capture boundary falls elsewhere), or confirm the label directly against the live Smart App. **Also checked and found accurate, no changes:** the Attachments step's single generic "Supporting documents" upload item (p.20) — its own screenshot has substantial blank space below the item with no second embedded image, confirming the screen is genuinely single-item and was not itself truncated. No newer manual revision superseding v5.23 was found at the `icp.gov.ae` source URL or via web search. ## Why this document exists This is a standing `GovSchema Standard Research` cycle ([GOV-1474](../../../../GOV-1474)). The United Arab Emirates previously had only Taxes-vertical (`ae/fta/vat-registration`, `ae/fta/corporate-tax-registration`) and Visa-vertical (`ae/icp/visa-single-entry-long-stay-pleasure`) schemas — 2 of 6 verticals. This cycle scouted all four of the UAE's remaining gaps (Passport, DMV, Business Formation, National ID) before picking this candidate: - **National ID (Emirates ID replacement/renewal, via ICP)** — **STRONG**. Both the citizen- and resident-category Smart App user manuals are directly downloadable PDFs (no login/CAPTCHA/WAF), genuinely screenshot-driven, and confirmed (by rendering and visually reading dozens of embedded screenshots) to walk a real, field-level wizard end-to-end. Picked this cycle. - **DMV (vehicle registration renewal, via RTA)** — medium/leaning strong. An RTA-branded "Vehicle Renewal User Guide v1.0" (24 pages, 68 screenshots) was found and one full-resolution screenshot confirmed genuine field-level UI capture, but only via a third-party mirror (`professionallawyer.me`) — the exact official `rta.ae` URL for this specific guide could not be located this cycle (sibling manuals at a similar `rta.ae` path pattern are still live, suggesting the source document moved or was renamed rather than being taken down). Left as a strong open backlog candidate for a future cycle that re-searches `rta.ae` directly for the current live equivalent. - **Passport (via ICP)** — weak/unresolved. The public service-detail page is checklist-level only (5 generic steps, 1 document, 4 fee lines), and a 231-page "Service Card Guide" PDF is a per-service text catalog (37 images across 231 pages), not a screenshot walkthrough. The same Smart App manual used for this document lists "Issue new passport (New\Renew)" only as a menu action inside the read-only Family Book viewer, never as an expanded field wizard. Left as an open backlog candidate; a future cycle should do a deeper page-by-page pass of the same manual before giving up on it. - **Business Formation (DED/Basher/Invest in Dubai/MOEC)** — confirmed still WEAK, unchanged from the GOV-1289/GOV-1371 cycles a year prior in research-time: no downloadable field-level PDF manual found at DED, ADDED, SEDD, or MOET; Basher requires UAE Pass login; `app.invest.dubai.ae` returns HTTP 403; `ded.ae` service-detail pages fail with a TLS/SNI error suggesting active bot-mitigation. Not an open candidate without new sourcing. ## Source examined - **Document `(id, version)`:** `ae/icp/emirates-id-replacement` / `1.0.0` - **Spec version:** GovSchema `0.3.0` - **Authority:** Federal Authority for Identity, Citizenship, Customs & Port Security (ICP), United Arab Emirates - **Primary source URL:** - **Secondary/corroborating source URL:** - **Official document title:** "Smart App – User Manual, English Version of the Application, Citizen Category", v5.23 (and its Resident Category sibling, same version) - **Retrieved / reviewed:** 2026-07-06 - **Reviewer:** GovSchema Engineering (initial authoring source-review) ## Access constraint and how it was worked around Both manuals are plain, directly downloadable PDFs from icp.gov.ae's own `ica_files` media path — no login, no CAPTCHA. The citizen-category manual is 72 pages (reconstructed via the PDF's page-tree object order, since it carries no legible printed page-footer numbering recoverable from its custom-subsetted fonts), of which 40 pages carry a unique embedded screenshot. Every field in this schema was read directly off those **rendered screenshots** (each page's embedded JPEG decompressed via zlib+DCTDecode and read with Claude's own vision capability), not the PDF's sparse/garbled text layer — the same discipline already used for `ae/icp/visa-single-entry-long-stay-pleasure`, `ae/fta/vat-registration`, and `ae/fta/corporate-tax-registration`. ## What was confirmed directly (verbatim, from the rendered screenshots) The manual's worked example walks: Home dashboard → "Most Used Services" popup → Department selection → **"Replace"** screen (two option cards, "Family Members" / "Sponsored") → **"Select Family Member"** (a scrollable list of family-book cards, each showing Relationship, Unified Number, Identity Number, EIDA Card Expiry Date, with a Select button — this selection screen is a navigation step, not modelled as applicant-input fields, the same way the sibling visa document does not model its own preceding Department → Module → Service selection screens) → the 5-sub-step **"Application Data"** wizard (tab ①): - **p.15, Step 1/5 Basic Information:** Preferred Language (dropdown, only selected value "ARABIC" visible), UAE Unified No (locked-style input, pre-filled from the selected family member — "511681" in the worked example, matching the family member "Fadl Nayef Ghanem Al-Nsaa" selected on the preceding screen), Applicant Class (locked-style input, fixed "UAE Citizen"). - **p.16, Step 2/5 Beneficiary Information:** First Name English ("FADL"), First Name Arabic ("فضل"), Second Name English ("NAYEF") — the screenshot is an un-scrolled single mobile viewport and cuts off immediately after Second Name English, so any further name fields below the fold (e.g. a Second Name Arabic, or Third/Family Name pair) are not confirmed and not modelled. - **p.17, Step 3/5 Passport Information:** Passport Type (dropdown, only "ORDINARY PASSPORT" visible), Passport Number ("264R5773"), Passport Issue Date ("01/02/2020") — again cut off before an expected Passport Expiry Date field (present in the sibling visa document's own Passport Information panel), which is not confirmed here and not modelled. - **p.18, Step 4/5 Delivery Address Information:** Delivery Method (dropdown, only "Deliver to specific address" visible), Delivery Company (locked-style input, fixed "Tawzea" — the UAE's national last-mile delivery operator), Delivery Emirates (dropdown, only "ABU DHABI" visible). - **p.19, Step 5/5 Residence Information:** no labelled input field — only a read-only address card (Emirate: DUBAI, City: DUBAI, UAE Phone number: 26655442, Detailed Address: blank, Address Source: UserProfile) and an "Add New Address" button. Modelled with an empty `fields` list at this step, the same convention this registry uses for read-only/navigation-only steps (e.g. the sibling visa document's own "Review Application" step) — no input field is directly confirmed here beyond a button whose own target sub-form was never expanded/screenshotted. - **p.20, Attachments (tab ②):** two toggle tabs "Required"/"Optional" (Required active), showing exactly **one** generic upload item labelled "Supporting documents" with an ✕ (remove) control — no further itemization. This is thinner than the sibling resident-category manual's analogous "Renew Emirates ID" Attachments step, which shows an itemized checklist ("PASSPORT COPY", "ORIGINAL ENTRY PERMISSION", "Emirates ID Card - Front", plus at least one further item cut off) — those items are residency-specific (e.g. "Original Entry Permission" presupposes an immigration entry event that does not apply to a citizen) and are deliberately **not** folded into this citizen-scoped document (see judgment call 3 below). - **p.21, Review Application (tab ③, first screen):** a pure read-only accordion recap (User Data, Basic Information, Beneficiary Information, Passport Information, Delivery Address Information) — not modelled as fields, consistent with this registry's convention. - **p.22, fee-summary screen:** "Emirates ID Services - Citizens - ID for Citizen - Replace Emirates ID" fee table (Card Issuance 300 AED, ICA Fees 40 AED, Total 340 AED, Refund Amount in case of Rejection 0 AED) — source-computed amounts, not applicant input, so not modelled as fields. The screenshot cuts off immediately after this table, before any Terms-and-Conditions checkbox would appear (see judgment call 2 below). - **p.23, Fees Payment screen:** Card Type (radio, Visa/Mastercard), Card Number, Expiration Month/Year, CVN, and an order-total line ("344.64 AED") — a card-entry screen, excluded from this schema the same way no other document in this registry models raw card-entry fields (see the sibling visa document's own Amwal-payment exclusion). - **p.24-25:** a success screen and a Tax Invoice PDF receipt (Federal Authority for Identity & Citizenship letterhead) — both read-only, not modelled. The receipt confirms a **two-stage fee** behavior worth flagging for any future execution-testing pass: the fee-summary screen's displayed total (340 AED) is not the final charged amount — an "ELECTRONIC PAYMENT FEES" surcharge (4.42 AED) plus its VAT (0.22 AED) is injected between the fee-summary screen and the actual payment screen, raising the real charge to 344.64 AED. ## Judgment calls / scope cuts (read before reviewing) 1. **Scoped to Replace, not first-time issuance.** Neither the citizen- nor the resident-category manual shows a genuine first-time/new Emirates ID issuance wizard expanded past its "Issue New Emirates ID" menu-tile label — it never becomes a field-entry screen in either 72-page or 57-page document. This schema is deliberately scoped to the confirmed "Replace Emirates ID" (citizen) pathway only. A reviewer with live-app access should check whether a first-time-issuance wizard exists and is simply un-screenshotted in both manuals, or whether first-time issuance in the UAE is handled through an entirely separate, non-app channel (e.g. at birth/naturalization registration). 2. ~~`termsAndConditionsAccepted` folded in from the sibling resident manual, not directly visible in this document's own citizen capture.~~ **Superseded by the GOV-1477 review-gate pass:** the citizen manual's fee-summary screen (p.22) is itself a two-image scrollable capture, and its second (below-the-fold) image directly shows an "Agree To The Terms And Conditions" checkbox. The field is now sourced directly from the citizen manual; the by-analogy inference from the resident manual described below is retired (kept here for history: the resident-category manual's analogous "Renew Emirates ID" fee-review screen — confirmed to share the same UI components as steps 3-5 of the citizen flow, in one case even showing the same example Request Number — is what the original authoring pass reasoned from, the same kind of by-analogy inference used in the sibling visa document for its `insideUaeEmirate` enum). 3. **Resident-manual's itemized document checklist deliberately NOT folded in.** Unlike the Terms-and-Conditions checkbox (a generic UI control reasonably assumed shared across services), the resident manual's Attachments checklist (Passport Copy, Original Entry Permission, Emirates ID Card - Front, +1 more) contains residency-specific items that do not obviously apply to a citizen replacing their own ID. This document models only the one generic "Supporting documents" upload item the citizen manual itself actually shows, and flags in-schema that the true citizen document requirement may be richer than this single generic slot suggests — a reviewer with live-app access should confirm the real citizen-flow document checklist. 4. **Undocumented dropdown option lists.** Preferred Language, Applicant Class, Passport Type, and Delivery Method each show only their selected value in the worked example's screenshot — no full option list is ever expanded on-screen. Per the discipline already established by `au/aec/voter-enrolment`'s `gender` field and the sibling visa document, none of these are modelled as `enum`; each is `type: "string"` with a description stating only the confirmed selected value. 5. **`deliveryEmirate` enum reused by analogy, not independently re-confirmed.** As with the sibling visa document's `insideUaeEmirate` field, the manual's own screenshot shows only "ABU DHABI" selected, not an expanded list. The 7-value enum is carried over from `ae/fta/vat-registration`'s and `ae/icp/visa-single-entry-long-stay-pleasure`'s own confirmed "Emirates" dropdowns. 6. ~~Below-the-fold fields not modelled (every wizard screenshot in this manual is a single un-scrolled mobile viewport).~~ **Superseded by the GOV-1477 review-gate pass:** each wizard page in fact embeds two stacked screenshots covering the full scroll, not one — the original authoring pass only read the first. Re-reading the second recovered 8 fields (see the "Independent review-gate re-verification" section above): `familyBookIssuanceDate`, `replacementReason`, `changeIdentityPersonalPhoto`, `passportIssueCountry`, `uaeMobileNumber`, `secondMobileNumber`, `residencePhoneNumber`, `residenceEmail`. Two further fields (a profession-type dropdown after `secondNameEnglish`; an Arabic-script field after `passportIssueDate`) are confirmed to exist but remain unmodelled because their exact labels fall in the crop seam between the two screenshots and are not recoverable from this source — a genuinely unresolved gap, not merely an unconfirmed guess. A Second Name Arabic / Third-or-Family-Name pair and a Passport Expiry Date remain unconfirmed and unmodelled too (no further embedded image exists on either page to check). 7. **Payment/card-entry fields excluded.** The Fees Payment screen (p.23: Card Type, Card Number, Expiration Month/Year, CVN) is excluded the same way the sibling visa document excludes the Amwal-hosted payment-gateway screen — no other document in this registry models raw card-entry fields. 8. **`uaeUnifiedNumber` modelled as applicant input despite being pre-filled/locked in the source.** The field is shown in a greyed/locked visual style (pre-populated from the family member selected on the unmodelled prior screen) rather than freely typed, but it is the sole beneficiary-identifying value this schema instance needs to be complete and is modelled as a required input for that reason, consistent with how `applicantClass` and `deliveryCompany` (also locked-style in the source) are handled. 9. **No array/repeating-field type (GSP-0009).** The "Select Family Member" screen (p.13) implies a citizen's family book may contain multiple members, any of whom could be the beneficiary of a given Replace ID application — this document models exactly one beneficiary per schema instance (the worked example's own scope), the same discipline already used by the sibling visa document for its one-sponsored-beneficiary scope. ## Path to a `verified` claim (next step) Items 1, 2, and most of item 3 below were completed by the GOV-1477 review-gate pass (see above). To advance this document further, a future reviewer needs to: 1. ~~Independently re-fetch both manuals and re-render/re-read each cited page, confirming every field `sourceRef` against the actual screenshot.~~ Done (GOV-1477). 2. ~~Confirm ICP has not since published a newer manual revision superseding v5.23.~~ Done (GOV-1477) — none found. 3. Obtain access to the live Smart App to: confirm or replace the `string`-typed dropdown fields with real `enum` option lists; recover the exact labels of the two still-unmodelled fields (the profession-type dropdown after `secondNameEnglish` and the Arabic-script field after `passportIssueDate`); confirm whether a Second Name Arabic / Third-or-Family-Name pair and a Passport Expiry Date exist beyond what either embedded screenshot shows; and confirm the true citizen-flow document checklist (see judgment call 3). 4. Per this registry's `structural-reference` maturity convention, advancing `maturity.criteria.verifiedSchema`/`agentReadySchema` beyond a second reviewer's field-by-field pass requires live-app execution testing, not just source re-verification. ## Re-verification Per the practice's **Cadence**, `nextReviewBy` is set to **2027-01-01** (~6 months). Re-check the source, and confirm no newer guide revision has been published, on or before that date and on any `source.url` change.